An alternate type scoring new Prolonged Private Features Questionnaire (EPAQ) was applied to assess new constructs out-of positive and negative androgyny. The newest EPAQ is actually administered to 196 mature men and women; their solutions was in fact categorized to your a differentiated androgyny. Extreme differences was obtained between negative and positive androgynous people as really since the anywhere between positive and negative feminine and you can positive and negative masculine someone towards the a set of actions out-of mental health and well-becoming. Such findings hold the legitimacy and you can utility out of recognize androgyny into positive and negative categories of intercourse part name.
Antill, J., Cunningham, J. (1979). Self confidence since the a function of maleness in genders. Log out-of Consulting and Health-related Therapy, 47, 783-785.
Antill, J., Cunningham, J., Russell, Grams., Thompson, Letter. (1981). A keen Australian Gender Role Level. Australian Journal out-of Mindset, 33, 169-183.
Baril, Grams., Elbert, N., Maher-Potter, S., Reavy, Grams. (1989). Try androgynous executives extremely more efficient? Category and Organisation Studies, 14, 234-249.
Bem, S. (1977). Toward electric out-of choice actions on the assessing of emotional androgyny, Log from Consulting and you will Medical Therapy, forty-five, 196-203.
Boswell, H. (1997). This new transgender paradigm shift toward 100 % free phrase. In B. Bullough, V. Bullough, J. Elias (Eds.), Sex merging (pp. 53-57). Amherst, NY: Prometheus.
Cheng, C. (1999). Gender part variations in awareness towards the influence of help availability toward anxiety. Log out of Character, 67, 439-467.
Fey, W. (1955). Anticipate by others as well as reference to invited out of thinking and you can others: https://datingranking.net/aisle-review/ A beneficial revaluation. Record out of Unpredictable and Public Psychology, 50, 274-276.
Green, B., Kendrick, D. (1994). This new appeal of sex type qualities during the various other relationship accounts: Androgynous properties could be trendy whatsoever. Journal of Personality and you can Social Therapy, 20, 244-253.
Heilbrun, A beneficial. (1981a). Sex differences in the working linkage anywhere between androgyny, public knowledge, and skills. Diary regarding Personality and Personal Therapy, 41, 1106-1118.
Helmreich, Roentgen., Stapp, J. (1974). Short brand of this new Texas Societal Behavior List, a target measure of notice-esteem. Bulletin of the Psychometric Neighborhood, cuatro, 473-475.
Hoffman, Roentgen. (2001). New dimensions away from manliness and femininity: Historic direction and you may effects having guidance. Record of Counselling and you will Advancement, 79, 472-485.
Jaccard, J., Wan, C., Turrisi, R. (1990). The brand new recognition and translation regarding interaction consequences anywhere between continuing details when you look at the multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Search, 25, 467-478.
Jones, W., Chernovetz, Yards., Hansson, R. (1978). Brand new enigma of androgyny: Differential effects for men and you will females. Journal out of Contacting and you may Medical Psychology, 46, 298-313.
Kelly, J., Worrell, J. (1977). The fresh preparations getting intercourse positions and you will androgyny: A serious feedback. Diary out-of Logical and Asking Psychology, 45, 1101-1115.
Kirchemeyer, C. (1996). Intercourse spots and you may decision making in the demographically diverse organizations: An instance having revitalizing androgyny. Gender Opportunities, 34, 49-663.
Kopper, B., Epperson, D. (1996). The experience and phrase of anger. Matchmaking with intercourse role socializing, despair and you can psychological state operating. Record off Consulting Therapy, 43, 58-165.
Lenney, E. (1991). Sex spots: The fresh new dimension regarding manliness, femininity, and you can androgyny. Within the J. Robinson, D. Razor, L. Wrightsman (Eds.), Tips from identity and you may personal emotional attitudes (pp. 573-660). San diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Lubinski, D., Tellegen, An effective., Butcher, J. (1981). The relationship anywhere between androgyny and you can personal evidence out-of psychological really-getting. Journal regarding Identification and Public Psychology, 40, 722-730.
Lubinski, D., Tellegen, A., Butcher, J. (1983). Manliness, womanliness and you may androgyny seen and you may reviewed as the distinct maxims. Diary away from Character and you will Personal Mindset, 44, 428-439.
s, C. (1989). Androgyny and its particular relation to adolescent emotional better-being: A look at the literature. Sex Opportunities, 21, 25-341.
May, A great., Spangenberg, J. (1997). Androgyny and you will coping during the guys which have good managerial direction. Southern African Record regarding Mindset, 27, 244-249.
Mead, B., Ignico, A great. (1992). Children’s sex had written attitudes out-of exercise: Effects and you can ramifications. Perceptual and Motor Experience, 75, 1035-1013.
Nowicki, S., Duke., Meters. (1981). The Nowicki-Strickland Life time Locus regarding Control Scales: Construct recognition. From inside the H. Meters. Lefcourt (Ed.), Look towards the locus regarding control create (Vol. dos, pp. 16-43). New york: Instructional Force.
O’Heron, C., Orlofsky, J. (1990). Stereotypic and you may low-stereotypic intercourse role characteristic and you will behavior orientations, sex term and you may emotional adjustment. Diary regarding Personality and you can Personal Therapy, 58, 134-143.
Pearson, J., Chefs, L. (1995). Sex and electricity. From inside the P. Meters. Kalbfleisch Meters. J. Cody (Eds.), Gender, strength, and you may interaction in peoples matchmaking (pp. 331-349). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Robinson, J., Razor, D., Wrightsman, L. (1991). Strategies out-of identification and you will public psychological perceptions. North park, CA: Harcourt Support Jovanovich.
Rose, A good., Montemayor, Roentgen. (1994). The connection anywhere between sex role orientation and observed thinking-proficiency inside male and female kids. Gender Positions, 30, 579-595.
Russell, Grams., Antill, J. (1984). A keen Australian intercourse-character size: More psychometric data and you may correlations having mind-admiration. Australian Psychologist, 19, 13-18.
Sawrie, S., Watson P., Biderman, M. (1991). Aggression, gender character tips and you may Kohut’s therapy of the care about. Gender Jobs, twenty five, 41-161.
Schullo, S., Alperson, B. (1984). Interpersonal phenomenology just like the a function of intimate orientation, sex, belief, and you may trait groups inside the future dyadic relationship. Log out of Personality and you may Public Mindset, 47, 983-1002.
Buy single post
Shaver, P., Papilia, D., Clark, C., Koski, L., Tidwell, Meters., Nalbare, D. (1996). Androgyny and you can attachment coverage: A couple of related models of max character. Identification and you can Public Therapy Bulletin, twenty two, 582-597.
Shimonaka, Y., Nakazato, K., Kawaai, C., Shinichi, S. (1997). Androgyny and you may effective adaptation across the life time one of Japanese people. Journal off Genetic Therapy, 158, 389-401.
Skoe, Elizabeth. (1995). Sex part orientation and its own relationship to the development of title and you will moral consider. Scandinavian Record of Therapy, thirty-six, 235-245.
Spence, J. (1984). Maleness, womanliness, and you will gender-associated faculties: An abstract study and you can feedback out of current look. Advances during the Experimental Identification Search, 13, 1-97.
Spence, J. (1999). 30 years regarding sex lookup: Your own chronicle. When you look at the W. Swann Jr., J. Langlois, L. Gilbert (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes into the modern society: The brand new intercourse research out-of erican Psychological Association.
Spence, J., Buckner, C. (2000). Crucial and expressive attributes, attribute stereotypes, and you may sexist thinking: What do they signify? Psychology of females Every quarter, twenty-four, 44-62.
Spence, J., Helmreich, Roentgen., Holahan, C. (1979). Bad and good components of emotional manliness and you will womanliness as well as their relationship to self-reports of neurotic and you may acting out habits. Diary out of Identity and you can Societal Mindset, 37, 1673-1682.
Spence, J., Helmreich, Roentgen., Stapp, J. (1974). The private Characteristics Questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and maleness-femininity. JSAS List of Picked Files inside the Psychology, 4, 43-forty-two.
Risk, J. (1997). Integrating expressiveness and you can instrumentality within the real world options: A unique angle with the benefits associated with androgyny. Gender Opportunities, 37, 541-564.
Taylor, Meters., Hall, J. (1982). Emotional androgyny: A review and you can reformulation of the theories, measures, and you will findings. Mental Bulletin, ninety-five, 347-366.
West, C., Zimmerman, D. (2000). Carrying out gender. In the M. Kimmel (Ed.), The brand new gendered society reader (pp. 131-149). New york: Oxford College Press.
Whitley, B. (1983). Intercourse role direction and you can notice-esteem: A critical meta-analytical opinion, Journal away from Personality and you can Social Mindset, forty-two, 765-778.
Woodhill, B., Samuels, C. (from inside the drive). Desirable and undesired androgyny: A medicine towards the twenty-very first century. Record regarding Gender Degree.
Wulff, M., Steitz, J. (1999). A course make of the connection ranging from profession indecision, androgyny, self-efficacy and you can care about-regard. Perceptual and you can Engine Experience, 88, 935-940.